<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style><head>
  <style></style>
    <table class="backgroundTable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
      bgcolor="#ffffff" width="100%">
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td align="left" valign="top">
            <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td style="border-top: 0px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);
                    border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);
                    background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align:
                    center;" align="center"><span style="font-size:
                      10px; color: rgb(96, 96, 96); line-height: 200%;
                      font-family: verdana; text-decoration: none;">Email
not
                      displaying correctly? <a
                        href="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/"
                        style="font-size: 10px; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);
                        line-height: 200%; font-family: verdana;
                        text-decoration: none;">View
                        it in your browser.</a></span></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td style="border-top: 0px solid rgb(51, 51, 51);
                    border-bottom: 0px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);
                    background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
                    <center><a href=""><img id="editableImg1"
                          src="cid:part2.04070701.01010909@oplin.org"
                          title="OPLIN" alt="OPLIN 4Cast" align="middle"
                          border="0"></a></center>
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
            <table style="width: 763px; height: 877px;" cellpadding="20"
              cellspacing="0" bgcolor="#ffffff">
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
                    line-height: 150%; font-family: trebuchet ms;"
background="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/wp-content/themes/4cast/images/kubrickbgwide.jpg"
                    bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">
                    <p><!-- Make sure you modify the 4Cast title in this section -->
                      <span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: bold;
                        color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial;
                        line-height: 110%;">OPLIN 4cast #383: Network
                        (non?)neutrality</span><br>
                      <!-- Make sure you modify the date of the 4Cast in this section -->
                      <span style="font-size: 11px; font-weight: normal;
                        color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-style: italic;
                        font-family: arial;">April 30th, 2014</span></p>
                    <!-- Begin copy of Web Source here  -->
                    <p style="text-align: justify;font-size: 16px;
                      font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><img
                        src="cid:part4.04090300.00050509@oplin.org"
                        alt="FCC seal" align="left" height="100"
                        width="110">Last Thursday, the FCC issued a
                      Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that laid out
                      changes the Commission will be considering in
                      order to comply with a January court ruling
                      striking down the FCC's 2010 Open Internet Order.
                      You've probably seen the ensuing news stories,
                      many of which have a headline something like "FCC
                      Kills Net Neutrality," since the NPRM is much more
                      lax about "pay-to-play" deals for Internet traffic
                      than the 2010 order. Network neutrality is seen as
                      an issue for libraries; the American Library
                      Association, for instance, has <a
                        href="http://www.ala.org/advocacy/telecom/netneutrality">concerns</a>
                      that if companies can pay for Internet "fast
                      lanes," libraries and other non-commercial
                      organizations will end up in the "slow lanes." But
                      this is a very complex issue that is easily
                      misunderstood. We've gathered some articles below
                      which try to untangle and dispassionately explain
                      the issue (despite some of their headlines).
                    </p>
                    <div> </div>
                    <ul style="text-align: left;">
                      <li style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;
                        font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><a
href="http://recode.net/2014/04/26/does-anyone-like-the-fccs-proposed-net-neutrality-rules/">Does
                          anyone like the FCC's proposed net neutrality
                          rules?</a> (Re/code /Amy Schatz) "Net
                        neutrality is the concept that Internet
                        providers can't block or discriminate among
                        legal Internet traffic. [FCC Chairman Tom]
                        Wheeler has <a
href="http://recode.net/2014/04/24/fcc-tries-explaining-new-net-neutrality-approach-as-techies-freak/">proposed</a>
                        allowing Internet providers charge content
                        providers for faster connections to subscribers
                        on the public Internet. Federal regulators would
                        limit how Internet providers could offer such
                        services, but the proposal sparked an outcry
                        from net neutrality proponents who believe the
                        change guts the concept of an open Internet."</li>
                      <li style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;
                        font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><a
href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/04/the-fccs-fast-lane-rule-is-awful-for-the-internet-just-ask-the-fcc/">The
                          FCC's "fast lane" rule is awful for the
                          Internet-just ask the FCC</a> (Ars
                        Technica/Jon Brodkin) "The FCC could have
                        reinstated all the rules in that [2010 Open
                        Internet] order by reclassifying ISPs as <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/01/how-the-fcc-screwed-up-its-chance-to-make-isp-blocking-illegal/">common
                          carriers</a>, but it chose not to. On the plus
                        side, Wheeler says the new rules will prevent
                        'blocking of lawful content' just as the old
                        ones did. But payments in exchange for an
                        Internet fast lane will be allowed as long as
                        they're 'commercially reasonable,' a much lower
                        standard than the one adopted in 2010."</li>
                      <li style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;
                        font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><a
                          href="https://medium.com/p/7805f8049503">How
                          the FCC plans to save the Internet by
                          destroying it: An explainer</a> (Medium/Ryan
                        Singel) "So this is what the FCC is going to do
                        for the entire internet. It's going to allow
                        ISPs to charge Netflix and YouTube and whomever
                        for fast access. ISPs won't be able to block
                        services, but it doesn't have to provide
                        services on a fair basis. The FCC is going to
                        try to draw up rules that try to make those
                        agreements sort-of-fair, but the strongest those
                        rules can be is holding ISPs to standard called
                        'commercially reasonable'. If it tries to make
                        the rules <em>actually</em> fair, then the FCC
                        has overstepped its authority."</li>
                      <li style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;
                        font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><a
href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/04/the-best-writing-on-net-neutrality/361237/">Net
                          neutrality: A guide to (and history of) a
                          contested idea</a> (The Atlantic/Alexis C.
                        Madrigal and Adrienne LaFrance) "If it is so
                        obvious, though, that net neutrality is a good
                        thing, then why has it remained a contested
                        idea? There are complications. The purity of
                        [Lawrence] Lessig's e2e ['end to end'] principle
                        does not remain in practice: there is a long
                        tradition of <a
href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2014/02/media-botching-coverage-netflix-comcast-deal-getting-basics-wrong.html">paid
                          commercial arrangements between content owners
                          and network operators</a>. Content-delivery
                        networks that have already created a 'fast lane'
                        for most professional sites, albeit
                        independently of the network owners. And as
                        Pennsylvania law professor Chris Yoo has long
                        argued (contra Wu), there might be <a
href="http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1485&context=fclj&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3DNetwork%2BNeutrality%2Band%2Bthe%2BEconomics%2Bof%2BCongestion%26btnG%3D%26as_sdt%3D1%252C5%26as_sdtp%3D#search=%22Network%20Neutrality%20Economics%20Congestion%22">benefits
                          to non-neutral networks</a>."</li>
                    </ul>
                    <div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
                    <p style="text-align: left; font-size: 20px;
                      font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;"><small><strong><em>Ironic
                            fact:</em></strong></small><br>
                    </p>
                    <div style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px;
                      font-family: arial; line-height: 110%;">Many point
                      to the recent deal Netflix made with Comcast for
                      an Internet "fast lane" as the beginning of the
                      end of network neutrality, so it is ironic that in
                      <a
href="http://www.engadget.com/2014/04/25/netflix-tivo-us-cable-operators/">other
                        news last week</a>, Netflix will now be provided
                      by some cable companies, instead of relying on the
                      Internet for content delivery.
                    </div>
                    <div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
                    <!-- End paste of web source here --> </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td style="" solid="" background-color:="" rgb(255,=""
                    255,="" 255);="" >=""
background="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/wp-content/themes/4cast/images/kubrickbgwide.jpg"
                    valign="top" width="760"><span style="font-size:
                      10px; color: rgb(96, 96, 96); line-height: 100%;
                      font-family: verdana;">
                      <hr><!-- Begin standard subscription verbiage -->
                      <div style="text-align: justify;">The <strong><em>OPLIN
                            4cast</em></strong>
                        is a weekly compilation of
                        recent headlines, topics, and trends that could
                        impact public
                        libraries. You can subscribe to it in a variety
                        of ways, such as: <br>
                      </div>
                      <div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
                      <ul>
                        <li style="text-align: justify;"><strong>RSS
                            feed.</strong>
                          You
                          can receive the OPLIN 4cast
                          via RSS feed by subscribing to the following
                          URL:
                          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/index.php/?feed=rss2">http://www.oplin.org/4cast/index.php/?feed=rss2</a>.
                        </li>
                        <li style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Live
                            Bookmark.</strong>
                          If you're using the Firefox
                          web browser, you can go to the 4cast website
                          (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/">http://www.oplin.org/4cast/</a>) and click on the
                          orange "radio wave" icon
                          on the right side of the address bar. In
                          Internet Explorer 7, click on
                          the same icon to view or subscribe to the
                          4cast RSS feed. </li>
                        <li style="text-align: justify;"><strong>E-mail.</strong>
                          You
                          can have the OPLIN 4cast
                          delivered via e-mail (a'la OPLINlist and
                          OPLINtech) by subscribing to
                          the 4cast mailing list at
                          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/OPLIN4cast">http://mail.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/OPLIN4cast</a>.
                        </li>
                      </ul>
                    </span> </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td style="border-top: 0px solid rgb(255, 255, 255);
                    background-color: rgb(255, 255, 204);"
background="http://www.oplin.org/4cast/wp-content/themes/4cast/images/kubrickfooter.jpg"
                    valign="top" width="760"> <br>
                  </td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
    <title>OPLIN 4Cast</title>
    <style>
 .headerTop { background-color:#FFFFFF; border-top:0px solid #000000; border-bottom:1px solid #FFFFFF; text-align:center; }
 .adminText { font-size:16px; color:#0000FF; line-height:200%; font-family:verdana; text-decoration:none; }
 .headerBar { background-color:#FFFFFF; border-top:0px solid #333333; border-bottom:0px solid #FFFFFF; }
 .title { font-size:20px; font-weight:bold; color:#000000; font-family:arial; line-height:110%; }
 .subTitle { font-size:11px; font-weight:normal; color:#000000; font-style:italic; font-family:arial; }
 .defaultText { font-size:12px; color:#000000; line-height:150%; font-family:trebuchet ms; }
 .footerRow { background-color:#FFFFCC; border-top:0px solid #FFFFFF; }
 .footerText { font-size:10px; color:#996600; line-height:100%; font-family:verdana; }
 a { color:#0000FF; color:#0000FF; color:#0000FF; }
  </style>
  </body>
</html>