<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">We use Jim's Upholstery on Center Ridge Rd in North Ridgeville.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><br clear="all"></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div style="text-align:left"><font face="tahoma, sans-serif" color="#666666"><span style="font-size:small"><b>Pam Myers</b><br></span></font></div><div style="text-align:left"><font face="tahoma, sans-serif" color="#666666"><span style="font-size:small"><b>Customer Service Manager</b></span></font></div><div dir="ltr"><div style="text-align:left"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">Grafton-Midview Public Library</span></div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif" color="#666666"><div style="text-align:left">983 Main St.</div><span style="font-size:small"><div style="text-align:left">Grafton, OH 44044</div></span></font><span style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:small"><div style="text-align:left"><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">P</font><font style="color:rgb(34,34,34)" face="tahoma, sans-serif"><font color="#888888"><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68)"></span></font><font color="#888888">h: <a href="tel:440-926-3317" value="+14409263317" target="_blank">440-926-3317</a> Fax: <a href="tel:440-926-3000" value="+14409263000" target="_blank">440-926-3000</a></font></font></div></span><img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1-LjCCez73lTZFViEOccI7IzHza1x3fUd&revid=0B9Ex8xcpNTgURWlUSEF2Tkc4N1M5dER1aXF2SEVGZTh0Y1B3PQ" width="193" height="200"><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68);font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </span><br></div><div dir="ltr"><span><span><span><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font color="#888888"><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68)"><br></span></font></span></span></span></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:00 PM <<a href="mailto:oplinlist-request@lists.oplin.org">oplinlist-request@lists.oplin.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Send OPLINLIST mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:oplinlist@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist@lists.oplin.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:oplinlist-request@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist-request@lists.oplin.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:oplinlist-owner@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist-owner@lists.oplin.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of OPLINLIST digest..."<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Follow-up on Lynda.com and LinkedIn (Ed Liddle)<br>
2. upholstery (Candy Baird)<br>
<br><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Ed Liddle <<a href="mailto:eliddle@marysvillelib.org" target="_blank">eliddle@marysvillelib.org</a>><br>To: "<a href="mailto:oplinlist@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist@lists.oplin.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:oplinlist@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist@lists.oplin.org</a>><br>Cc: <br>Bcc: <br>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:47:09 +0000<br>Subject: Re: [OPLINLIST] Follow-up on Lynda.com and LinkedIn<br>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>This is an interesting event that has impacted Ohio libraries. I appreciate reading the information and opinions about it.
<br>
<br>
It looks like microsoft's <span class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513st">$26.2-billion <em></em></span>acquisition of linked in in 2016 is working out really well for them. in 2018 there seemed to be a focus about data mining or integrating linked in to other microsoft products to improve
microsoft offerings for their customers.<br>
Here are some news stories about how well it has been working from Feb of 2018 <br>
<a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/microsoft-linkedin-how-marriage-is-working-out/" target="_blank">https://www.cbsnews.com/news/microsoft-linkedin-how-marriage-is-working-out/</a><br>
<a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://redmondmag.com/articles/2018/02/26/microsoft-and-linkedin-no-news.aspx" target="_blank">https://redmondmag.com/articles/2018/02/26/microsoft-and-linkedin-no-news.aspx</a>
<br>
</p>
<p>In my opinion, It makes logical sense to be able to integrate linked in which my understanding is considered a "professional" social network highlighting its members' professional strengths, work experience, and allows businesses to find skilled people to
hire they need to fulfill jobs. Lynda.com offers informal training to people needing to learn about new things or brush up their skill sets as needed. Lynda.com is more affordable than formal higher education, whether someone is degree seeking or not. This
can be useful for professional growth and linked in is a platform where members can list specific skills. From this perspective integrating linked in and <a href="http://lynda.com" target="_blank">lynda.com</a> makes a lot of sense especially if they are ran by the same organization. There will be less
reinventing the wheel when it comes to user authentication, tracking skill sets, etc. It will also I assume allow for a single sign on experience for both products, one less password to remember. I know the library staff at our library enjoy single sign-on
when it comes to logging into the computers, ILS, and email accounts that Microsoft active directory provides.
<br>
</p>
<p>It is my understanding Microsoft windows and their other products are used a lot by professionals here in Ohio. I have to wonder if there are any plans to tie everyone's consumer/home microsoft online accounts/Student office 365 accounts to linked in and
<a href="http://lynda.com" target="_blank">lynda.com</a> perhaps at a future date. I could see where this would be useful feature for job seekers to make it easier to market themselves. It also would make it easier for people that are employed to keep their professional experiences current in case they
become job seekers. This would also take single sign-on to another level for home/consumers.
<br>
<br>
Microsoft offers a free version of office 365 that many libraries and institutions of higher education are using that includes a hosted version of exchange, the ability to use office 365 hosted apps like word, excel, sharepoint and some others. It also includes
office 365 pro plus office suite that can be installed locally on a computer. This is tracked on a per user basis for activation. Each user can activate it on I think 5 computers. Each user can go into their account and deactivate the license on unused computers
which frees it up to use on another device. Microsoft also makes software donations to tech soup that libraries can use too. I am unsure what the underlying costs actually are for these but we as a library community are greatful for it and use it. Perhaps
the linked in and <a href="http://lynda.com" target="_blank">lynda.com</a> integration is one of those underlying costs in the big scheme of things.
<br>
</p>
<p>How deep could the rabbit hole go? <br>
Will Ohio libraries collaborate together in protest and start voting with their publicly funded wallets, using alternatives to the operating systems and software that microsoft owns to avoid the integration with linked in, like using apple OSX, Linux, LibreOffice,
Firefox, Scribus, google apps, etc? That will be up to the library directors and what is in the best interest of the communities their library serve.
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>-Ed Liddle <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-cite-prefix">On 6/12/19 2:41 PM, Nicholas Slone via OPLINLIST wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>I would like to hopefully initiate a broader conversation about privacy and library ethics, not just with library leadership, but the entire public library community in Ohio. I'm having flashbacks of Mark Zuckerberg testifying in front of Congress, when
it was painfully obvious that most legislators didn't have a clue what he was saying or what types of questions could/should be asked. I know we have many competent leaders in the library community, but also a vast wealth of knowledge in our other co-workers,
particularly those with a high degree of tech skills. I also want to thank you, Don, for identifying this as a major problem and spreading the word. My words below are
<b>bolded. </b><br>
</p>
<p><b>Disclaimer #1: I've been using and loving Lynda.com. I've vastly improved my knowledge of music theory and various software.
</b><b><br>
</b></p>
<p><b>Disclaimer #2: I've been off of facebook for around 18 months, and I feel like my brain has finally been returned to me. I believe strongly that social media, in its current form, as well as the associated behavioral algorithms, the contents of which
are mostly hidden from public view, are influencing us to be dumber, meaner, more likely to buy useless stuff, waste our time, and compromise our true values.</b></p>
<p><b>Also, please correct me if you believe any of my comments are incorrect. </b>
<br>
</p>
<p><b>These companies, including LinkedIn, are virtually unregulated and devoid of any meaningful set of ethics, other than pursuing growth and profit. As public companies, most of their corporate charters contain clauses which allow for the CEO to be sued,
if they put anything above the pursuit of profit. Most of the venture capitalists that have supplied the startup funds for these companies are expecting a 100x return on investment, and they've reached a breaking point where they have to put up or shut up....monetize,
monetize, monetize. Grow, grow, grow. The easiest way to monetize these services is by selling the data they collect from users. The data they collect from our patrons will be much more lucrative to them than even the value of our contract. There is currently
a digital gold rush to get as much data as possible. In other words, they're operating from a very different set of motivations than public libraries.
</b><b><br>
</b></p>
<p><b>I have some questions and comments about the material from the transition link:</b><br>
</p>
<p>"While for-profit companies which provide library information services have, for years, been collecting and processing patron information (e.g. OverDrive, Hoopla, Demco’s line of library software), and in some cases linking to external social media accounts,
never before has a social media account been required for use of library-paid resources. OPLIN staff raised our objections with Lynda/LinkedIn Learning representatives when we were informed in December of plans for this new requirement."</p>
<p><b>Restated, this points out that we're all already compromised, in some way. We've invested heavily in companies that are exploiting our users. This doesn't mean it's right or that we don't still need to watch these companies closely. Remember the sunk
cost fallacy. I know of at least one attempt of Overdrive, which is now owned by a multi-national media conglomerate called Rakuten, approached the Ohio Digital Library with a proposal to integrate a service called "Viber," which is essentially Rakuten's version
of WhatsApp. They billed it as a book discussion platform, which would be opt-in for patrons. Their privacy policy is problematic, and it contains a clause that basically says the policy can change if they're acquired by a third party. This plan was ultimately
rejected, as far as I know. Is this what just happened with LinkedIn and Lynda?</b><br>
</p>
<p>"No threat on OPLIN's part Is likely to alter LinkedIn's course..."</p>
<p><b>Do they care about us renewing the contract at the end of the term? Would collected protest/action and negative publicity by a majority of Ohio librarians alter their course? Would pulling promotion of the product or spreading information about avoiding
LinkedIn and their associated products make a difference? These are some of the options we should be considering. I would love to hear what other library leaders are considering/planning. After all, we're still the same group that resisted National Security
Letters from the FBI, right? Does anyone know if ALA will be getting involved? </b>
<br>
</p>
<p>"In subsequent discussion, the Committee determined that while requiring a LinkedIn account was abhorrent, the value of the resource was such that OPLIN should maintain the subscription, particularly as those libraries which had previously provided Lynda.com
could not, mid-year, pick up this relatively expensive subscription for themselves. The OPLIN Board of Trustees concurred."</p>
<p><b>So, is this another way of saying that money trumps values? Are we all selling out our patrons, now? Quick experiment, if you're interested: see if you can find a teenager that knows what "sellout" means. And, again, if anyone's interested in the definition
of the sunk cost fallacy: </b><br>
</p>
<p><b><a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sunk-cost-fallacy" target="_blank">https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sunk-cost-fallacy</a></b><br>
</p>
<p>"LinkedIn has, in fact, been praised for its compliance with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the plain-language clarity of its data privacy policies, and the tools LinkedIn provides its users for control over their personal
information. Of course, effective usage of these tools requires a degree of information literacy that novice users have not developed. And without access to a working LinkedIn Learning for Libraries platform, no one has been able to begin developing guides
to help librarians help their patrons." <br>
</p>
<p><b>It's not just that novice users haven't developed this level of information literacy. Virtually no one has. I have a LinkeIn account from years ago, so I logged in. It's true that if you dig into the settings, you have some control of what you share.
But, typically, and displayed prominently on the dashboard, there are messages and banners and interfaces encouraging you to share more, telling the user that their profile is "incomplete," and that by giving up more information, the service will be so much
better and improve their lives. The European law still doesn't go far enough, because it only covers "personally identifiable information." But, they don't need your name to push their products and influence your behavior. Some of the most lucrative sections
of this new digital economy are comprised of "anonymized data," which is another way of saying "everything about you, besides your name/specific address," without your opt-in permission. Again, though, they will make it extremely attractive to opt-in and more
painful to avoid opting in. </b><b>And they and their partners can target you, without knowing your name, based on the other attributes you supply.
<br>
</b></p>
<p><b>Then, there's this from the FAQ:</b></p>
<p><span></span></p>
<dl><dt><span style="font-style:italic">"Will all the stats and information I currently have at Lynda Admin transfer over to LinkedIn Learning?</span>
</dt><dd><br>
</dd><dd><span>Not all of it. After the change, libraries will no longer have access to some user learning activity (such as certificates earned) or personally identifiable information (such as email addresses). You will have access to basic use metrics: number
of users, number of videos, etc. OPLIN has collected these basic usage statistics for all libraries since July 2019. If you want more detailed information or a longer history of stats, please visit the <a href="https://www.lynda.com/ReportsDashboard" target="_blank">Lynda
Reports Dashboard</a> and download the reports you need."</span>
<p><span></span></p>
</dd><dt><br>
</dt><dt><br>
<p><b>If I'm not mistaken, this means that LinkedIn will automatically have MORE data about our patrons than WE do. If we select another product at the end of this contract, this would make it much more difficult to contact our Lynda users to notify them of
the alternative. This also might mean we won't be able to see the most popular certificates our patrons are pursuing, so that we can use this info in selecting an alternative. While we're in this period of uncertainty, I would recommend getting a list of your
patrons using the service, so that you can communicate with them on short notice. Will LinkedIn be using these email addresses to promote Premium subscriptions? Will they use it to maintain the user base, in the event we cancel the contract?
</b><br>
</p>
<p><span></span></p>
</dt><dt><span style="font-style:italic">"I have concerns about the privacy of patron information that is to be shared with LinkedIn.</span>
</dt><dd><span>Online privacy is important, and it is good for librarians to inform themselves and to help educate their patrons. In part, LinkedIn is moving the Lynda.com information within the LinkedIn environment to strengthen protections around user data, and
to provide Lynda users with better tools for managing how their information may and may not be used."</span>
<p><b>When these tech startups, and even Apple, use language like "strengthen protections around user data" and "better tools for managing how their information may and may not be used," while simultaneously pushing a change that will require or encourage us
to provide more information, it's important to read between the lines. In reality, this means more opportunities for each user to elect to share. If there are 25 toggles for different sharing options, it increases the possibility that many of those will be
toggled "on" without the user having any real knowledge of the implications. </b>
<br>
</p>
<p><b>My final question is this: what section of our contract with Lynda/LinkedIn gives them the justification for imposing this requirement on the library community? I think we should all see the exact language, since we routinely negotiate contracts with
private entities. Who knows, maybe Sirsi-Dynix will soon require us all to have Instagrams, in order to use our library catalog. The longer our partnerships endure, the harder it will be to break away, if we don't adequately plan for alternatives. We've seen
facebook's strategy of introducing distasteful changes in small increments, in order to limit backlash, and it's reasonable to assume others will employ the same strategy. What's our plan for keeping them as honest as possible? An open source and/or nonprofit
alternative to as many of these services as possible would be wonderful, as well as pressuring legislators for more regulation.
</b><br>
</p>
<p><b><u>Suggested Podcast Episodes</u></b></p>
<p><b>"Why Should We Care About Privacy?" - Crazy/Genius by The Atlantic</b></p>
<p><b><a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://pca.st/z49Q" target="_blank">https://pca.st/z49Q</a></b></p>
<p><b>"What Happened in Vegas" - Your Undivided Attention by The Center for Humane Technology</b></p>
<p><b><a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://pca.st/u0MD" target="_blank">https://pca.st/u0MD</a></b><b><br>
</b></p>
<p><b><u>Suggested Books</u></b></p>
<p><b>The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff</b></p>
<p><b>Team Human by Douglas Rushkoff</b></p>
<p><b>Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus by Douglas Rushkoff<br>
</b></p>
<p><b>Digital Minimalism by Cal Newport</b></p>
<p><b>And the website for Center for Humane Technology, which is mostly comprised of former tech insiders and CEOs...with extremely guilty consciences:</b></p>
<p><b><a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://humanetech.com/" target="_blank">https://humanetech.com/</a></b></p>
<pre class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-signature" cols="72">Sincerely,
Nicholas Slone
Executive Director
Adams County Public Library</pre>
<div class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-cite-prefix">On 6/8/2019 10:12 AM, Don Yarman via OPLINLIST wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">There is a growing chorus of concern over Lynda.com becoming LinkedIn Learning, and the new requirement for library users to have LinkedIn accounts to continue using the resource. (Please see the announcement at
<a href="https://oplin.ohio.gov/lynda-transition" target="_blank">https://oplin.ohio.gov/lynda-transition</a>.) That is good—it is the duty of librarians to safeguard the information lives of their patrons. While for-profit companies which provide library
information services have, for years, been collecting and processing patron information (e.g. OverDrive, Hoopla, Demco’s line of library software), and in some cases linking to external social media accounts, never before has a social media account been required
for use of library-paid resources. OPLIN staff raised our objections with Lynda/LinkedIn Learning representatives when we were informed in December of plans for this new requirement.<br>
<br>
It was not until the end of March that the company delivered a presentation about LinkedIn Learning for Libraries. OPLIN’s
<a href="https://oplin.ohio.gov/CAC" target="_blank">Content Advisory Committee</a> attended this webinar, and offered LinkedIn staff their suggestions and their frank opinions. In subsequent discussion, the Committee determined that while requiring
a LinkedIn account was abhorrent, the value of the resource was such that OPLIN should maintain the subscription, particularly as those libraries which had previously provided Lynda.com could not, mid-year, pick up this relatively expensive subscription for
themselves. The OPLIN Board of Trustees concurred.<br>
<br>
OPLIN and its peer organizations across North America continue to press LinkedIn for changes that will align more closely with library ethics concerning patron data. It is important to note two things:<br>
<ol>
<li>LinkedIn’s practices are not illegal. State laws governing library patron information address only the disclosure, by libraries, of
<i>library records</i>; they do not cover the personal information that users of library services themselves provide to library vendors.</li><li>No threat on OPLIN’s part to end our agreement is likely to alter LinkedIn’s course for the future of Lynda content access. (It is rather more likely that LinkedIn would take legal action to hold OPLIN to its original agreement to maintain the subscription
through June 2021.)</li></ol>
LinkedIn has, in fact, been praised for its compliance with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the plain-language clarity of its data privacy policies, and the tools LinkedIn provides its users for control over their personal information.
Of course, effective usage of these tools requires a degree of information literacy that novice users have not developed. And without access to a working LinkedIn Learning for Libraries platform, no one has been able to begin developing guides to help librarians
help their patrons. <br>
<br>
OPLIN’s services are funded directly from public library money, and we strive to align those services with guidance we receive from the public library community. The guidance we have received so far indicates that library decision-makers are disturbed by this
change, but saw a greater value in having OPLIN continue to provide statewide access to the content.
<div><br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr"> Don Yarman<br>
Director, Ohio Public Library Information Network<br>
2323 W Fifth Ave Suite 130, Columbus OH 43204<br>
<a href="mailto:don@oplin.ohio.gov" target="_blank">don@oplin.ohio.gov</a> | 614.728.5250<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> <br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
OPLINLIST mailing list -- <a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist" target="_blank">http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist</a>
*** OPLIN now offers a Tier III-rated data center for libraries to use. Find out more: <a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.oplin.ohio.gov/co-location-service" target="_blank">https://www.oplin.ohio.gov/co-location-service</a> ***
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
OPLINLIST mailing list -- <a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist" target="_blank">http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist</a>
*** OPLIN now offers a Tier III-rated data center for libraries to use. Find out more: <a class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.oplin.ohio.gov/co-location-service" target="_blank">https://www.oplin.ohio.gov/co-location-service</a> ***
</pre>
</dd></dl></blockquote>
</div>
<br><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Candy Baird <<a href="mailto:bairdca@deltapubliclibrary.org" target="_blank">bairdca@deltapubliclibrary.org</a>><br>To: Oplinlist <<a href="mailto:oplinlist@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">oplinlist@lists.oplin.org</a>><br>Cc: <br>Bcc: <br>Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:55:00 -0400<br>Subject: [OPLINLIST] upholstery<br><div dir="ltr">Looking for someone to do upholstery work in the Northwest Ohio area. Does anyone have any recommendations. <br clear="all"><div><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail-m_7389349828096135513gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span style="background-color:rgb(0,0,255)"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:garamond,serif"></span></font></span></span><font face="garamond,serif"><font size="2">Candy Baird<br>Director<br>Delta Public Library<br></font></font></div><font face="garamond,serif"><font size="2">402 Main Street<br></font></font></div><font face="garamond,serif"><font size="2">Delta, Ohio 43515<br></font></font></div><font face="garamond,serif"><font size="2">419-822-3138 (office)<br></font></font></div><font face="garamond,serif"><font size="2">419-822-5310 (fax)<br></font></font></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
OPLINLIST mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org" target="_blank">OPLINLIST@lists.oplin.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplinlist</a><br>
</blockquote></div>