[OPLINTECH] Public Workstation Upgrade

[Chad Neeper]

I'm working with one of the Intel NUCs right now and got to thinking about
the one thing I like the LEAST about the VESA-mount mini computers:

It's the power button.

It's inevitably on the back-side of the LCD. So unlike a true AiO, where
you press one conveniently located power button, with the Intel NUC and
other VESA-mount sff computers, you have two power buttons:  one
conveniently located one for the LCD and another inconveniently hidden
power button for the computer itself.

The Intel NUC, at least, does have an internal header in the computer so
that you could potentially hook up an external power button if you wanted
to, but I haven't done that yet. I suppose I could sticky-attach a remote
power button to the side of the LCD or something... but it's still a kludge.

Chad



______________________________
*Chad Neeper*
Senior Systems Engineer

*Level 9 Networks*
740-548-8070 (voice)
866-214-6607 (fax)

*Full IT/Computer consulting services -- Specialized in libraries and
schools*

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Fred Miller Jr <
fmiller at auglaizelibraries.org> wrote:

> Tim,
>
> I might to be able to help out some with this. For our patron computers we
> are upgrading them to this:
>
> ·
> http://www.microcenter.com/product/466785/IdeaCentre_300-23_23_Touchscreen_All-in-One_Desktop_Computer
>
> While I agree with you on the SSD drive or the public computers, I can’t
> suffice spending the extra money in the machines for the time of use the
> patrons are on them. These computers have been put into 2 of our branches
> and have been working out just fine. I’m not a big fan of Acer anyway. Have
> had to many bad experiences with them in the past.  I also use the CPU
> benchmark software to compare CPU’s to see what we need to implement into
> our system. I have seen a lot of libraries going to AiO’s either made by HP
> or Lenovo that we had visited. By the way, the new Intel NUC’s might be
> worth checking out as well since you get big performance in a small
> footprint.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
>
>
> [image: Logo Resized]
>
> *203 Perry Street Wapakoneta, OH 45895*
>
>
>
> *Fred Miller Jr*
>
> IT Service Manager
>
> *T*: *419-738-1215 <419-738-1215>* |* E*: *fmiller at auglaizelibraries.org
> <fmiller at auglaizelibraries.org>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* OPLINTECH [mailto:oplintech-bounces at lists.oplin.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Tim Burns
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 14, 2016 8:27 AM
> *To:* oplintech at lists.oplin.org
> *Subject:* [OPLINTECH] Public Workstation Upgrade
>
>
>
> Dear Tech folks,
>
>
> Please help “brainstorm” a configuration for the public workstations.
>
>
> While I’m convinced that the future will not be anything like our current
> patron offering (witness most patrons spending their technology dollar$ on
> todays smartphone/tablet, the popularity of laptops as home computer
> selection, schools switching to 1:1 using Chromebooks, and more “cloud” -
> based computing than ever.) desktops are what our staff are used to. Not
> rock the boat today.
>
> I’m looking for performance first. Performance comes from RAM, and CPU.
> Our new configuration should be 8GB of RAM, and quad-core (Intel i5 or
> better) processing/CPU. I use CPU Benchmarks to compare between various
> offerings of CPU. This levels the playing field by describing what a
> processor can do - given a specific task on similarly configured system.
> Here’s the site I’m looking at for comparison:
> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html Generally, I want
> processing rating of 7000 or better as a starting point.
>
> This machine is a starting point:
> https://www.cdw.com/shop/products/Acer-Veriton-Z4820G-Wub-Core-i5-6500-3.2-GHz-8-GB-500-GB-LED-23.8in/4076440.aspx?enkwrd=4076440&pfm=srh
>
>
> I’d prefer SSD drive (solid state) as there is a tremendous performance
> boost - and we don’t require a lot of storage on the public system. This
> model, being an all-in-one, includes larger (23+”) display and camera.
> Camera would be helpful as an image or document scanner alternative- would
> be available at each station.
>
> Tim Burns
> Birchard Public Library of Sandusky County Ohio
>
>
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are
> intended solely for the use of the addressees and may contain legally
> privileged, protected or confidential information. If you have received
> this message in error, and/or you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail reply and please delete this
> message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any unauthorized use,
> reproduction, forwarding, distribution, or other dissemination of this
> transmission is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPLINTECH mailing list
> OPLINTECH at lists.oplin.org
> http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/oplintech
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oplin.org/pipermail/oplintech/attachments/20160715/01579d8c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.oplin.org/pipermail/oplintech/attachments/20160715/01579d8c/attachment-0001.jpg>