[Digihubsadmin] FW: Re: FADGI Compliance

Tue Jun 3 14:54:44 EDT 2014

My apologies, I just discovered I made a big mistake and forgot to add Angela to this admin list, thinking that the Kabis situation did not affect her. I've just rectified that.

Angela, the thread below concerns testing of the new scanner in Toledo, which just barely failed the FADGI test at 600 dpi at the A0 size. (I think I got that right.)

So I wonder now if the Columbus scanner installation has progressed to the point where it could be tested? If it also fails that same FADGI test, or isn't even supposed to be able to do 600 dpi at A0, then the scanner in Toledo may be as good as we're going to get.

Stephen
--
Stephen Hedges, Director
Ohio Public Library Information Network (OPLIN)
2323 W. Fifth Ave., Suite 130, Columbus, OH 43204
614-728-5250  ::  hedgesst at oplin.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Wale" <jeff.wale at toledolibrary.org>
> To: "Chatham Ewing" <chatham.ewing at cpl.org>
> Cc: "digihubsadmin (digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org)" <digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 10:05:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Digihubsadmin] FW: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting – I’ll send it on to Don and Kirtas.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Chatham Ewing [mailto:chatham.ewing at cpl.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:25 AM
> To: Wale, Jeff
> Cc: digihubsadmin (digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org)
> Subject: Re: [Digihubsadmin] FW: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Attached is a snapshot of the tech specs page from the i2s website as of
> today at 9:05. Note that it promises "600 x 600 optical on A0 format."
> 
> Chatham
> 
> 
> _____________
> Chatham Ewing
> Digital Initiatives & Services Strategist
> Cleveland Public Library
> 325 Superior Avenue
> Cleveland, OH 44114
> chatham.ewing at cpl.org
> http://www.cpl.org
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Jeff Wale" < jeff.wale at toledolibrary.org >
> To: "digihubsadmin ( digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org )" <
> digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org >
> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:39:02 AM
> Subject: [Digihubsadmin] FW: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> The latest . . . .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Wale, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 8:36 AM
> To: 'Don Williams'
> Subject: RE: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> There was no discussion during contract negotiation of the image size limited
> to A1 to pass FADGI Level 2 standards. It sounds like they are back pedaling
> just to pass and get signoff.
> 
> 
> 
> My contract is based on meeting the manufacturer’s functionality and
> performance specs. So, If Kirtas can show me an i2s spec sheet saying the
> unit will only pass level 2 FADGI at A1, then I’ll have to accept it. If
> not, I think the scanner should be required to pass at the A0 size.
> 
> 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Don Williams [ mailto:don-williams at rochester.rr.com ]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 9:50 PM
> To: Wale, Jeff
> Subject: Fwd: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> Was this your understanding of the areal extent over which
> a true 600 dpi applied ?....only over an A1 size area ?
> 
> Its likely that it will pass FADGI 2 star at this new position.
> 
> Don Williams
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> Subject:
> 
> Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> Date:
> 
> Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:30:48 -0400
> 
> 
> From:
> 
> Bart Selby <bselby at Kirtas.com>
> 
> 
> To:
> 
> Don Williams <don-williams at rochester.rr.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You move the camera down about a foot for position 2 and then the camera will
> only see an A1 size area in the optical direction.
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Droid
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original message-----
> 
> 
> From: Don Williams <don-williams at rochester.rr.com>
> To: Bart Selby <bselby at Kirtas.com>
> Sent: Tue, Jun 3, 2014 01:18:27 GMT+00:00
> Subject: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> Thanks Bart,
> 
> So, what is the difference between position 1 and 2 ?
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I did all the 600dpi scans with the camera in position 1 and A0 size
> selected.
> Bart
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Droid
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original message-----
> 
> 
> From: Don Williams <don-williams at rochester.rr.com>
> To: Jackie Chastang <jchastang at kirtas.com>
> Cc: mhanseniiri at gmail.com , 'Bart Selby' <bselby at kirtas.com>
> Sent: Mon, Jun 2, 2014 20:21:10 GMT+00:00
> Subject: Re: FADGI Compliance
> 
> 
> Jackie,
> 
> Questions answered below.
> 
> I am traveling today but here are the abridged answers.
> 
> They do not have the targets.
> I can do the testing on Wednesday,.....but w/o targets ? ( I can send
> the targets but need an acct. number from a courier)
> I suspect Toledo would accept the results......but the on-demand
> part of this is stretching it a bit.
> 
> I will be back in Rochester on Wednesday but will be catching up
> on a number of things.
> 
> I'm not quite sure what "position" Bart did the originals in
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Don,
> 
> 
> 
> Per our conversation with i2S today, they have confirmed that you can not
> achieve 2 star FADGI compliance at 600 DPI A0. In order to pass FADGI, you
> need the 600DPI at A1 size and camera in position 2.
> 
> 
> 
> Our action plan:
> 
> 
> 
> 1. Send Bart there on Wednesday morning to set the scanner using the
> recommended settings by i2S.
> 
> 2. Are the test targets in Toledo?
> 
> 3. Will you be available on Wednesday to complete the testing if Bart sends
> you the images?
> 
> 4. Will Toledo Library accept the testing via email or do they want you on
> site?
> 
> 
> 
> Please let me know what date you are available so we can conclude the testing
> and have the customer sign off of the install, training and testing.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> Jackie Chastang
> 
> Manufacturing/Service Manager
> 
> Kirtas Technologies
> 
> 7620 Omnitech Place
> 
> Victor, NY 14564
> 
> Phone: 585-924-2420 x 3000
> 
> Fax: 585-924-2441
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Digihubsadmin mailing list
> Digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org
> http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/digihubsadmin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Digihubsadmin mailing list
> Digihubsadmin at lists.oplin.org
> http://lists.oplin.org/mailman/listinfo/digihubsadmin
> 